The Borough was demanding the closure of a place of worship established for many years, in a zone where this type of activity was not permitted.\u00a0 The leaders of the association managing this place sought our intervention. \u00a0They were asking that the Borough modify its zoning rules for this place of worship to be allowed to continue its activities, in the same location.<\/p>\n
It is not up to the Ombudsman to decide which amendments should or could be made to zoning regulations. \u00a0This jurisdiction lies with the Borough Councils.\u00a0 We informed the plaintiffs accordingly and closed our file.<\/p>\n
However, the Borough\u2019s elected officials later announced their intent to expand the zones in which places of worship would be permitted, namely on the second floors in some commercial areas.\u00a0 These regulatory amendments would regularize the situation of the place of worship which had complained to our office.<\/p>\n
Since our office often handles complaints regarding problems of cohabitation between residences, businesses, institutions and places of worship, we deemed it appropriate to submit comments to the Borough administration and elected officials so as to provide additional input and remind them of undertakings contained in the Montr\u00e9al Charter of Rights and Responsibilities.<\/em><\/p>\n More particularly, we raised awareness on the importance of planning reasonable guidelines and specific rules to ensure the safety of the premises, the cleanliness of the area, the adequate management of possible nuisances (noise, traffic, parking), thereby promoting harmony among all citizens. \u00a0The Borough welcomed our comments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Borough was demanding the closure of a place of worship established for many years, in a zone where this type of activity was not permitted.\u00a0 The leaders of the association managing this place sought our intervention. \u00a0They were asking … Continue reading