{"id":1766,"date":"2012-05-24T13:45:02","date_gmt":"2012-05-24T17:45:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/?page_id=1766"},"modified":"2012-05-24T13:45:02","modified_gmt":"2012-05-24T17:45:02","slug":"permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010","title":{"rendered":"Permit denied in spite of a foreseen regulation change (2010)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A citizen from Arrondissement de Pierrefonds-Roxboro had started installing a PVC roof over his rear balcony, before obtaining the required permit. When he submitted his permit request, the borough rejected his request because the use of PVC was not authorized by the <em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Zoning By-Law<\/span><\/em> in effect at the time, for that type of construction: the borough also requested that the structure be demolished.<\/p>\n<p>Our investigation confirmed that, indeed, the current By-Law did not allow the use of PVC for the roof of such a structure. However, we learned that modifications to this By-Law were already planned and that, very soon, this material would be allowed.<\/p>\n<p>We questioned the appropriateness of requiring the demolition of this structure if PVC was soon to be permitted.<\/p>\n<p>Following our intervention, the borough agreed to suspend its demolition request until the new <em><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Zoning By-Law<\/span><\/em> was adopted. The citizen later obtained his permit and completed the installation of his PVC roof.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A citizen from Arrondissement de Pierrefonds-Roxboro had started installing a PVC roof over his rear balcony, before obtaining the required permit. When he submitted his permit request, the borough rejected his request because the use of PVC was not authorized &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"parent":322,"menu_order":12,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1766","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Permit denied in spite of a foreseen regulation change (2010) - OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Permit denied in spite of a foreseen regulation change (2010) - OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A citizen from Arrondissement de Pierrefonds-Roxboro had started installing a PVC roof over his rear balcony, before obtaining the required permit. When he submitted his permit request, the borough rejected his request because the use of PVC was not authorized &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/en\\\/cases-handled\\\/examples-of-cases-handled\\\/miscellaneous\\\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/en\\\/cases-handled\\\/examples-of-cases-handled\\\/miscellaneous\\\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010\",\"name\":\"Permit denied in spite of a foreseen regulation change (2010) - OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-05-24T17:45:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/en\\\/cases-handled\\\/examples-of-cases-handled\\\/miscellaneous\\\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/en\\\/cases-handled\\\/examples-of-cases-handled\\\/miscellaneous\\\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/en\\\/cases-handled\\\/examples-of-cases-handled\\\/miscellaneous\\\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cases handled\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/en\\\/cases-handled\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Examples of cases handled\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/en\\\/cases-handled\\\/examples-of-cases-handled\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Miscellaneous\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/en\\\/cases-handled\\\/examples-of-cases-handled\\\/miscellaneous\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":5,\"name\":\"Permit denied in spite of a foreseen regulation change (2010)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Permit denied in spite of a foreseen regulation change (2010) - OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Permit denied in spite of a foreseen regulation change (2010) - OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al","og_description":"A citizen from Arrondissement de Pierrefonds-Roxboro had started installing a PVC roof over his rear balcony, before obtaining the required permit. When he submitted his permit request, the borough rejected his request because the use of PVC was not authorized &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;","og_url":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010","og_site_name":"OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010","url":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010","name":"Permit denied in spite of a foreseen regulation change (2010) - OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-05-24T17:45:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous\/permit-denied-in-spite-of-a-foreseen-regulation-change-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cases handled","item":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Examples of cases handled","item":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Miscellaneous","item":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/cases-handled\/examples-of-cases-handled\/miscellaneous"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"Permit denied in spite of a foreseen regulation change (2010)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/","name":"OMBUDSMAN de Montr\u00e9al","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1766"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1766\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ombudsmandemontreal.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}